Posting Criminal Bond, ICE Pickup, Failure to Appear – 12 Things to Know

An ICE pickup after posting criminal bond can leave a family confronting two separate legal systems at the same time.

A person may satisfy the conditions for release from a Florida county jail, only to be transferred directly into the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Meanwhile, the Florida criminal case remains open, the court dates remain scheduled, and the criminal bond continues to carry obligations.

If the person misses criminal court because ICE detained or transferred them, the court may initially issue a warrant or declare the bond forfeited. However, Florida law provides important protections when a defendant could not appear because the person was confined in an immigration detention facility.

The key is acting quickly.

Families, criminal defense attorneys, immigration attorneys, and bail agents should coordinate before the criminal bond is posted whenever possible. They should also preserve proof of detention, identify every upcoming court date, and address the criminal case before an ICE transfer turns into a failure-to-appear problem.

Posting Criminal Bond Does Not Guarantee Release Home

A criminal bond is part of the state or federal criminal case.

The bond permits a defendant to leave criminal custody while the case remains pending, subject to conditions such as:

  • Appearing at every required hearing;
  • Avoiding new arrests;
  • Complying with no-contact orders;
  • Following travel restrictions;
  • Reporting to pretrial supervision; and
  • Obeying other conditions imposed by the court.

Posting the required bond ordinarily ends the person’s detention on the criminal case. However, it does not override a valid immigration detainer or require ICE to release the person.

When ICE has lodged a detainer, the local jail may notify ICE that the person is otherwise eligible for release and maintain custody for up to 48 additional hours so immigration officers can assume custody. An immigration detainer is a request for notification and temporary continued detention; it is not itself a final removal order or an immigration-bond decision.

As a result, the family may post thousands of dollars expecting the person to walk out of the county jail, only to learn that the person was transferred to ICE instead.

What Is an ICE Detainer?

An ICE detainer is a notice and request issued to a federal, state, or local law-enforcement agency that already has custody of a person.

The detainer generally asks the agency to:

  • Notify ICE before the person is released;
  • Provide information about the anticipated release; and
  • Maintain custody for up to 48 hours beyond the time the person otherwise would have been released so ICE can take custody.

ICE states that if it does not assume custody during the additional 48-hour period, the holding agency must release the person unless another lawful basis for detention exists.

A detainer does not automatically prove that the person is removable. It also does not decide whether the person qualifies for immigration bond, asylum, cancellation of removal, adjustment of status, or another defense.

Those questions are handled separately under federal immigration law.

Florida Law Requires Notice of a Valid Immigration Detainer

Florida law imposes duties on a state or local law-enforcement agency that holds a person subject to an immigration detainer.

Under Florida Statutes § 908.105, the agency must notify the judge authorized to address bail, record the detainer in the person’s file, comply with the requests in a qualifying detainer, and notify the state attorney. The judge must record the existence of the detainer in the criminal-court record.

This statutory notice is important, but it does not solve every later problem.

The notice may establish that a detainer existed when bail was considered. It does not necessarily tell the criminal judge:

  • When ICE ultimately took custody;
  • Where the person was transferred;
  • Whether another transfer occurred;
  • Whether the person remains available for a hearing;
  • Whether ICE plans to remove the person; or
  • Why the person missed a later court date.

Criminal counsel should therefore provide the court with updated detention information rather than assuming that the original detainer notice will excuse every future absence.

Criminal Bond and Immigration Bond Are Separate

Posting Florida criminal bond does not mean the person qualifies for immigration bond.

The two proceedings involve different courts, statutes, and standards.

A Florida criminal judge decides whether the defendant may remain out of criminal custody while the criminal case is pending. An Immigration Judge may conduct a separate bond hearing only when the person is eligible and the Immigration Court has jurisdiction.

In immigration-bond proceedings, the Immigration Judge may consider whether release would create:

  • A danger to people or property;
  • A risk that the person will not appear; or
  • A national-security concern.

Certain detainees—including some arriving aliens and people detained under specified criminal or security provisions—may fall outside the Immigration Judge’s bond jurisdiction entirely. Immigration bond proceedings are also legally separate from the underlying removal case.

A state judge’s decision to grant criminal bond does not bind ICE or the Immigration Judge.

Likewise, a person may receive immigration bond while still facing an active Florida warrant or unresolved state bond conditions.

Should the Family Post Criminal Bond?

Posting criminal bond may still be necessary even when ICE is expected to take custody.

It may:

  • End continued detention based on the criminal charge;
  • Prevent the criminal bond from remaining unresolved;
  • Allow criminal counsel to move the state case forward;
  • Place the person in a position to seek immigration bond;
  • Clarify which agency has legal custody; or
  • Help the person avoid prolonged detention in two systems.

However, the family should understand what is likely to happen before paying the bond.

Before posting, try to determine:

  • Whether ICE actually lodged a detainer;
  • Whether another warrant or hold exists;
  • The next criminal-court date;
  • The exact bond conditions;
  • Whether the person has a prior or final removal order;
  • Whether the person may qualify for immigration bond;
  • Whether the bail bond company understands the expected ICE transfer;
  • Whether criminal counsel has a plan for the next hearing; and
  • Whether immigration counsel has reviewed the criminal charges.

Posting bond without a coordinated plan may trigger an immediate transfer while leaving the criminal court, attorney, and bail agent unprepared.

What Happens After ICE Takes Custody?

Once ICE takes custody, the person may be held locally, transferred to another Florida facility, or moved to another state.

Families can use ICE’s Online Detainee Locator System to search by the person’s A-number and country of birth or by exact biographical information. The system may not display every detainee immediately, and it does not list people under 18.

After locating the person, record:

  • The complete name used in ICE records;
  • A-number;
  • Detention facility;
  • Facility telephone number;
  • Date of transfer;
  • ICE field office;
  • Criminal booking number;
  • Criminal case number; and
  • Every upcoming criminal hearing.

Provide that information promptly to criminal counsel, immigration counsel, and the bail agent.

Do not assume that ICE will transport the person to a state hearing automatically.

Failure to Appear While in ICE Detention

A failure to appear occurs when a defendant does not attend a required criminal-court proceeding.

The immediate consequences may include:

  • A bench warrant or capias;
  • Revocation of pretrial release;
  • Forfeiture of a bond;
  • More restrictive bond conditions later; and
  • A separate criminal prosecution when the failure was willful.

These consequences are related but legally distinct.

Bench Warrant or Capias

The court may issue a warrant when the defendant does not appear.

The warrant can remain active even if the person is already detained by ICE. It may later result in arrest if the person is released from immigration custody, granted immigration bond, returned to Florida, or encountered by law enforcement.

Bond Forfeiture

The court may declare a cash or surety bond forfeited because the defendant failed to appear.

Florida law, however, contains a specific protection for defendants confined in immigration detention.

Separate Criminal FTA Charge

Florida Statutes § 843.15 criminalizes a willful failure to appear after release under Chapter 903.

When the underlying release relates to a felony charge, a willful failure to appear may constitute a third-degree felony. When the release relates to a misdemeanor, it may constitute a first-degree misdemeanor.

The requirement of willfulness matters.

A person who was involuntarily confined in an ICE facility may have strong evidence that the absence was not deliberate. Nevertheless, the defendant should not assume that the warrant, forfeiture, or new allegation will disappear automatically.

Florida’s 60-Day Protection Against Bond Forfeiture

Florida Statutes § 903.26 provides a major protection for defendants who miss court because they are confined in immigration custody.

The statute directs the court to discharge a bond forfeiture within 60 days upon determining that, at the time of the required appearance or within 60 days afterward, the defendant:

  • Was confined in an institution or hospital;
  • Was confined in a county, state, federal, or immigration detention facility;
  • Was deported; or
  • Was deceased.

The statute also permits discharge when appearance was impossible because of circumstances beyond the defendant’s control.

This protection is stronger than a general request for sympathy or judicial discretion. The statute expressly includes immigration detention.

However, families should not assume the clerk, judge, prosecutor, or bail company will discover the detention and correct the forfeiture without a request.

Counsel or another proper party should act promptly to:

  • Obtain the forfeiture notice;
  • Determine the required deadline;
  • File the appropriate motion;
  • Submit ICE detention records;
  • Establish the dates of confinement;
  • Request discharge of the forfeiture; and
  • Notify the surety or bail agent.

The 60-day period is critical.

If the statutory discharge procedure is not used successfully, Florida’s remission statute may provide separate but more limited relief depending on surrender, apprehension, timing, costs, and whether the delay harmed the prosecution.

Cash Bond and Surety Bond Are Not the Same

A surety bond and a cash bond involve different financial arrangements.

Surety Bond

A licensed bail bond company guarantees the defendant’s appearance. The family ordinarily pays a premium and may sign an indemnity agreement or provide collateral.

The bond company may face forfeiture when the defendant misses court and may contact the family, seek records, surrender the defendant where legally possible, or pursue remedies under the agreement.

Cash Bond

A person deposits money directly with the clerk.

Even when the bond is not forfeited, Florida law may require the clerk to withhold money for unpaid prosecution costs, appointed-counsel costs, court fees, court costs, and criminal penalties. This can occur regardless of who originally posted the cash.

Families should therefore avoid assuming that all cash will automatically be returned once the case or warrant is resolved.

What Counsel Can Do Before the Court Date

The strongest strategy is often to address ICE custody before the person misses court.

Depending on the type of hearing, the judge’s authority, and local procedure, criminal counsel may consider:

  • Filing a motion to continue;
  • Asking the court to excuse or waive personal appearance where legally permitted;
  • Requesting remote appearance;
  • Seeking an order that preserves the bond;
  • Asking the prosecutor to agree to a continuance;
  • Providing advance proof of ICE detention;
  • Requesting transport or another procedure to secure the defendant’s attendance; or
  • Asking the court to set a status conference involving counsel rather than the detained defendant.

Not every hearing can proceed without the defendant.

Trials, pleas, sentencing proceedings, and other critical stages may have stricter appearance requirements than routine scheduling or status hearings.

The motion should explain:

  • The person’s detention location;
  • Why attendance is impossible or impractical;
  • What efforts counsel made;
  • Whether ICE has transferred the person;
  • Whether removal may occur;
  • What relief is requested; and
  • How the criminal case can continue without prejudice.

What to Do After a Warrant Is Issued

If a court already issued a warrant, act quickly.

Criminal counsel may consider asking the court to:

  • Recall or withdraw the warrant;
  • Set aside the failure-to-appear finding;
  • Reinstate or modify bond;
  • Reset the hearing;
  • Recognize that the absence was involuntary;
  • Discharge the bond forfeiture;
  • Permit a remote appearance; or
  • Enter another order protecting the defendant’s position.

Useful supporting documents may include:

  • ICE custody records;
  • The immigration detainer;
  • The immigration Notice to Appear;
  • Facility booking information;
  • Transfer records;
  • Removal or travel records;
  • Detainee-locator results;
  • Criminal-court notices;
  • Communications showing efforts to notify counsel; and
  • Affidavits from family members or attorneys.

The objective is to create a clear record that the defendant did not intentionally disappear or ignore the court.

ICE Removal Before the Criminal Case Ends

ICE may continue immigration proceedings while the Florida criminal case remains unresolved.

In some cases, ICE may transfer the person far from Florida or seek removal before the criminal matter is completed.

Removal from the United States does not automatically dismiss the Florida charges.

A warrant may remain active. The open case may continue to affect immigration relief, future travel, reentry, visa eligibility, and the person’s ability to resolve the matter later.

Where transfer or removal appears imminent, criminal and immigration counsel may need to evaluate:

  • A criminal continuance;
  • A request that ICE delay removal;
  • An immigration stay request;
  • Communication with the prosecutor;
  • Whether the criminal matter can proceed remotely;
  • Whether a negotiated resolution is possible; and
  • Whether the defendant’s presence is legally required.

No single strategy applies to every case. The correct approach depends on the charge, immigration status, prior orders, available defenses, and procedural posture.

Criminal Pleas Can Create Lasting Immigration Consequences

A quick criminal plea may appear to solve the jail problem while creating permanent immigration damage.

Immigration law does not classify offenses solely by whether Florida calls them felonies or misdemeanors.

The consequences may depend on:

  • The exact criminal statute;
  • Elements of the offense;
  • Plea language;
  • Sentence imposed;
  • Suspended sentence;
  • Amount of loss;
  • Controlled-substance allegations;
  • Domestic relationship;
  • Firearm involvement;
  • Fraud;
  • Violence;
  • Immigration status; and
  • Prior convictions.

Drug offenses, theft, fraud, domestic-violence allegations, firearms offenses, and crimes involving violence require particular caution.

In Padilla v. Kentucky, the Supreme Court held that criminal defense counsel must advise a noncitizen concerning the deportation risks of a guilty plea. When the immigration consequence is clear, correct advice is required; when it is less clear, counsel must at least warn that the plea may carry adverse immigration consequences.

The goal should not simply be to obtain “time served” or avoid a felony label.

A misdemeanor may be devastating under immigration law, while a carefully structured resolution to a more serious state charge may sometimes create fewer immigration consequences.

Criminal and immigration counsel should review the proposed disposition before the plea is entered whenever possible.

Pending Criminal Charges Can Affect Immigration Bond

An arrest is not the same as a conviction, but Immigration Judges may consider criminal allegations and supporting records when deciding danger and flight risk.

Evidence may include:

  • Arrest reports;
  • Charging documents;
  • Probable-cause affidavits;
  • Protective orders;
  • Criminal history;
  • Pending charges;
  • Prior failures to appear;
  • Evidence of rehabilitation;
  • Family ties;
  • Employment history; and
  • Proposed release conditions.

A pending criminal case may therefore make immigration release more difficult even when Florida granted criminal bond.

Some people also face mandatory immigration detention or another jurisdictional restriction that prevents an Immigration Judge from setting bond.

Immediate Steps for Families

Before Posting Criminal Bond

  • Confirm whether ICE lodged a detainer.
  • Obtain the criminal case number and charges.
  • Identify every upcoming court date.
  • Review the bond amount and conditions.
  • Notify criminal and immigration counsel.
  • Speak with the bail agent about the expected transfer.
  • Determine whether a prior removal order exists.
  • Develop a plan for the next criminal hearing.

Immediately After ICE Takes Custody

  • Search the ICE detainee locator.
  • Record the A-number and detention facility.
  • Confirm the transfer date.
  • Send proof of detention to counsel.
  • Notify the bail agent.
  • Review eligibility for immigration bond.
  • Determine whether ICE has begun transfer or removal arrangements.
  • Preserve every document and communication.

After a Missed Criminal Hearing

  • Obtain the warrant or capias.
  • Obtain the forfeiture notice.
  • Determine the 60-day deadline under § 903.26.
  • File the appropriate motion promptly.
  • Submit proof of ICE confinement.
  • Ask the court to address the warrant and bond separately.
  • Coordinate with the surety.
  • Preserve the record for any appeal or later proceeding.

Frequently Asked Questions

Will Posting Criminal Bond Cause ICE to Take Custody?

It may.

When ICE has lodged a detainer, posting criminal bond or otherwise becoming eligible for release may trigger notification and transfer to ICE.

Does an ICE Detainer Prevent Release From County Jail?

A qualifying detainer may ask the jail to hold the person for up to 48 additional hours beyond the time the person otherwise would be released so ICE can take custody.

Does Posting Florida Criminal Bond Mean the Person Qualifies for Immigration Bond?

No.

Criminal and immigration bond are separate proceedings. Some ICE detainees are not eligible for an Immigration Judge bond hearing.

Can Florida Forfeit Bond When the Defendant Is in ICE Detention?

A forfeiture may initially be declared after a missed appearance. However, § 903.26 directs discharge within 60 days when the required statutory showing establishes that the defendant was confined in an immigration detention facility at the relevant time.

Is Missing Court While in ICE Detention a New Crime?

Not automatically.

A separate prosecution under § 843.15 requires a willful failure to appear. Involuntary ICE detention may provide strong evidence that the absence was not intentional.

Can the Judge Recall the Warrant?

Possibly.

Counsel may ask the judge to recall or withdraw the warrant, but the result depends on the evidence, procedural history, charges, prior appearance record, and the court’s ruling.

Can a Defendant Appear Remotely From ICE Custody?

Possibly, depending on the type of hearing, the facility, available technology, and the judge’s approval. Remote appearance is not guaranteed.

Can ICE Remove Someone While a Florida Criminal Case Is Open?

Potentially.

An open Florida case does not automatically prevent immigration transfer or removal. Criminal and immigration counsel should coordinate immediately when removal appears possible.

What Documents Prove the Defendant Could Not Attend?

ICE detention records, detainer documents, facility records, transfer paperwork, detainee-locator results, removal records, court notices, and attorney communications may all be useful.

Conclusion: Protecting Both Cases Requires Coordination

An ICE pickup after posting criminal bond can create a chain reaction.

The criminal court may believe the defendant disappeared. The clerk may declare the bond forfeited. A warrant may remain active. ICE may oppose immigration release because of the pending charges. Meanwhile, the family may struggle to locate the person or understand which court controls the next step.

Florida law provides meaningful protection when ICE confinement caused the missed appearance, including the bond-forfeiture discharge provisions in § 903.26.

However, those protections should be raised promptly and supported with reliable documentation.

The strongest response is coordinated action:

  • Confirm the detainer before posting bond;
  • Inform both attorneys;
  • Prepare for transfer;
  • Protect the next criminal-court date;
  • Preserve ICE records;
  • Address any warrant immediately;
  • Act within the bond-forfeiture deadline; and
  • Do not enter a criminal plea without understanding the immigration consequences.

Posting criminal bond may end county-jail custody, but it does not end the criminal case, guarantee release home, or resolve the immigration matter.

For more legal informative content like this, please visit our website at https://blog.cruise.law or our content-only blog at https://www.tyrese.esq, where content on a wide range of issues is posted daily. Follow Attorney Cruise on Instagram @attorney.cruise or the law firm’s Instagram Account @cruiselawgroup.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information about Florida criminal bonds, ICE immigration detainers, transfers from local custody, failures to appear, bench warrants, bond forfeitures, immigration detention, criminal pleas, and immigration-bond proceedings. It does not address every Florida bond condition, criminal charge, court procedure, federal detention category, removal order, immigration consequence, surety agreement, cash-bond issue, or defense to a failure-to-appear allegation.

Florida criminal laws, federal immigration laws, court rules, detention policies, and agency procedures may change. This information does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult qualified Florida criminal defense and immigration counsel regarding the specific criminal case, ICE detainer, bond, court date, detention status, immigration history, and available relief.

Cruise Law Group is a Florida-based Law Firm, and any posts on criminal defense matters apply SOLELY in Florida. The Firm is located in Orlando, Florida, and can be reached via EMAIL or CALL.

CLG: +14076748822

Sources and Suggested Further Reading

Florida Statutes § 843.15 — Failure of Defendant on Bail to Appear
https://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0800-0899/0843/Sections/0843.15.html

Florida Statutes § 903.26 — Bond Forfeiture and Discharge
https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2025/903.26

Florida Statutes § 903.28 — Remission of Bond Forfeiture
https://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0900-0999/0903/Sections/0903.28.html

Florida Statutes § 903.286 — Withholding From Cash Bonds
https://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0900-0999/0903/Sections/0903.286.html

Florida Statutes § 908.105 — Duties Related to Immigration Detainers
https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2025/908.105

ICE — Immigration Detainers
https://www.ice.gov/immigration-detainers

ICE — Online Detainee Locator System
https://locator.ice.gov/

ICE — Attorney Information and Resources
https://www.ice.gov/detain/attorney-information-resources

EOIR — Immigration Bond Proceedings
https://www.justice.gov/eoir/policy-manual-eoir/part-II/icpm/chapter-8-3

Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-651.ZS.html

Dr. Tyrese Cruise, Esq

Scroll to Top